W3161452233 Peer-reviewed research AI × management and organizations

Automated video interview personality assessments: Reliability, validity, and generalizability investigations.

Louis Hickman · Nigel Bosch · Vincent Ng · Rachel Saef · Louis Tay · Sang Eun Woo

Also recorded as: doi:10.1037/apl0000695

Journal of Applied Psychology · 2022-08-01

Recorded claims
2
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
1
crossref-api-metadata
Recorded limitations
5
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The work investigates reliability, validity, and generalizability of automated video-interview personality assessments.

confidence: moderate crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: title-level metadata; abstract not inspected

The title identifies reliability, validity, and generalizability tests of automated video-interview personality assessments.

confidence: moderate crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: title-level

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Cites (0)

No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Cited by (0)

No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Crossref supplied bibliographic metadata but no abstract.
  • Scope and claim are limited to the title-level description.
  • Crossref supplied only year and month, so published_date is null rather than an inferred day.
  • Crossref title metadata only; an abstract was not present in the retained response and full text was not inspected.
  • The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.

Source independence

publisher-only