From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that technologically capable AI-active firms in China differ in their engagement with market-led and government-led standard setting, with technological diversity and government ownership shaping those responses.
Scope: abstract-level firm standard-setting study
The abstract links technological capability, institutional logics, competition, and ownership to AI-active firms’ participation in market- versus government-led standard setting in China.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (2)
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; no full text inspected
- Bound from an already-retained journal-query response containing multiple works; no post-audit refetch
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only