From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Patent-data analysis of publicly traded firms reports that acquiring AI analytics capability after an IPO is associated with a smaller decline in innovation quality and with continued recombination of existing technologies, partly by easing short-term financial and disclosure pressures.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; firm innovation strategy after IPO; the abstract describes more than 1,000 firms but gives no exact denominator or period
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- The captured abstract supplies only an approximate firm count and no study period; numerical effect sizes are not carried forward.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
Source independence
publisher-only