From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Across three randomized field experiments and 4,867 software developers, the abstract reports an estimated 26.08% increase in completed tasks among developers using an AI coding assistant, with higher adoption and larger gains among less-experienced developers.
Scope: Universe and denominator: 4,867 developers across Microsoft, Accenture, and an anonymous Fortune 100 company overall; unit: developer and completed task; period: not displayed; arm, take-up, and experience-subgroup denominators are not displayed.
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The abstract reports a 10.3% standard error but does not display arm counts, take-up denominators, study periods, or task-quality outcomes; the estimate conditioned on tool use should not be read as a simple randomized-access intention-to-treat effect.
Source independence
ssrn-only