From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Across four experiments with approximately 1,100 participants in facial-recognition and hiring contexts, the abstract reports that congruent human and AI signals and the option to request AI advice increase employee convergence with AI recommendations.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20
The Crossref abstract examines how signal congruence and optional AI advice shape employees’ alignment with AI recommendations in human–AI teams.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract-level metadata
The abstract explains how signal fit, optional AI advice, and congruent human–AI signals shape employees’ decision alignment in human–AI teams.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (5)
- When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions
- Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
- A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Constructing Envelopes: How Institutional Custodians Can Tame Disruptive Algorithms
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The participant denominator is reported approximately in the abstract.
- Volume and issue were absent in the observed Crossref metadata; online-first status is based on that absence.
- Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the publisher Early View listing returned an access challenge and was not used.
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only