From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The paper conceptualizes commercial algorithmic-management systems as commodified, outsourced authority in which technology vendors that design, sell, or operate managerial systems share portions of employer authority over employees.
Scope: Interdisciplinary theoretical model combining legal theory, organizational studies, and social computing; no empirical sample, period, or denominator
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The shared-authority model is theoretical and is not empirically tested on the abstract page.
- The abstract does not define the range of vendors or employment settings to which the model is intended to generalize.
Source independence
ssrn-only