From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Using team situation-awareness theory, the review frames AI agents as active collaborators and organizes a research agenda around team formation, coordination, maintenance, and training, with shared mental models, trust, conflict resolution, delegation, responsibility, and skill adaptation as central mechanisms.
Scope: Conceptual review and research outlook on human-AI teams; the abstract reports no corpus size, search period, study denominator, or empirical effect estimate
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract does not describe the review search strategy, inclusion criteria, corpus size, or time window.
- The proposed four-part framework and gaps are an agenda rather than empirically validated organizational effects.
Source independence
ssrn-only