W4411346982 Peer-reviewed research AI × management and organizations

How and for whom using generative AI affects creativity: A field experiment.

Shuhua Sun · Zhuyi Angelina Li · Maw-Der Foo · Jing Zhou · Jackson G. Lu

Also recorded as: doi:10.1037/apl0001296

Journal of Applied Psychology

Recorded claims
1
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
1
google-scholar-result
Recorded limitations
3
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The work is presented as a field experiment on generative-AI use and creativity; the inspected Scholar result snippet places LLM assistance among employees in the workplace.

confidence: moderate google-scholar-result apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: search-result snippet and bibliographic metadata; abstract not inspected

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Cites (0)

No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Cited by (0)

No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Crossref supplied bibliographic metadata but no abstract.
  • The work-context determination uses a full APA PsycInfo abstract rendered in the retained Google Scholar result; publisher full text was not inspected.
  • Crossref supplied only year and month, so published_date is null rather than an inferred day.

Source independence

corroborated:google-scholar-result