From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A game-theoretic model examines how strategic users may game organizational emotion-AI systems used for resource allocation, customer care, or employee monitoring and derives adoption, policy-design, welfare, and regulation implications relative to human staffing or management.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; organizational adoption, algorithmic management, customer care, and governance
The publisher preview models organizational use of emotion AI for resource allocation when users can strategically misrepresent emotions.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (1)
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue heading.
Source independence
publisher-only