From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract proposes a three-level model of AI as tool, teammate, or workforce, together with a human-agent integration metric and design patterns for handoffs and organizational readiness.
Scope: abstract-level framework
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text not inspected.
- The abstract reports a 40–60% routine-work range for unspecified 'most innovative organizations' without a stated universe or denominator; that statement is treated as anecdotal and is not used in the claim.
- The author discloses being a co-founder of DialogAI, whose deployments are discussed.
Source independence
ssrn-only