From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
An online survey of employees in algorithmically managed environments reports negative associations between algorithmic management and both autonomy and job satisfaction, alongside a statistically significant but directionally unspecified relationship with employee performance.
Scope: Online survey of employees working under algorithmic management; the abstract reports no sample size, country or sector universe, observation period, coefficient, effect size, condition denominator, confidence interval, test statistic, or p-value
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract omits the sample size, recruitment frame, geography, sectors, study period, scale properties, model specification, coefficients, and inferential statistics.
- The abstract does not state the direction of the performance relationship, so no positive-performance claim is made here; the observational design also does not establish causation.
Source independence
ssrn-only