From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The review integrates negative human-machine teaming phenomena into task, process, relationship, and communication conflict, distinguishes conflict arising from direct human-machine asymmetries from disagreements embedded through system design, and groups remedies into machine, human, and interaction adaptations.
Scope: Conceptual synthesis grounded in organizational conflict theory; no review corpus, sample denominator, or observation period is reported
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract does not report a review protocol, corpus size, inclusion criteria, or empirical validation of the four-dimensional framework.
- The page states it was revised on 2026-08-13; only the public abstract manifestation observed on 2026-08-20 was inspected.
Source independence
ssrn-only