From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract frames autonomous AI agents as organizational members operating under delegated authority and proposes an interlocking rights-and-governance architecture that maps human-resource-management ideas about governing intelligent actors onto agent governance.
Scope: abstract-level organizational-member rights and governance framework
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and either framework's complete articles or mechanisms were not inspected.
- The rendered SSRN abstract ends mid-sentence after describing the eleven-article AIAIRS rights architecture, so the ARM component cannot be characterized from this page alone.
- Historical and regulatory examples named by the abstract were not independently verified and are not used as evidence in the claim.
- The page discloses structured collaboration with Anthropic's Claude; this lane does not assess that collaboration.
- Append-only bookkeeping correction: this row supersedes E1-L05-R022 solely to replace the invalid confidence token medium with the schema-valid token moderate; evidence, claim scope, provenance, and screening disposition are unchanged.
Source independence
ssrn-only