From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The narrative review argues that organizational AI-readiness frameworks should assess cognitive and psychological effects on the humans expected to oversee AI, synthesizing work on deskilling, cognitive offloading, decision architecture, psychological safety, workforce transition, and accountability.
Scope: Narrative review across five thematic domains plus an early assessment tool; no review corpus, sample, study period, validation denominator, or statistical result is reported
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract does not provide review search methods, included-study counts, dates, or validation data for the assessment tool.
- The author declares being co-founder of the venture that developed the assessment tools discussed in the paper.
Source independence
ssrn-only