From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Participating North American technology-startup founders estimated that absent AI they would need 55% more employees on average, versus a 17% median and nearly one-third expecting no additional employees; formal workflow integrators estimated counterfactual headcount increases nearly four times those of informal users, while randomized optimistic or pessimistic information shifted beliefs and delegation preferences on average.
Scope: Universe: participating North American technology-startup founders; unit: founder-reported belief and intended work organization; period and sample denominator: not displayed. The percentages and ratio are denominator-incomplete self-reports and are treated as anecdotal rather than observed employment effects.
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The sample size, study period, condition counts, effect sizes, and formal/informal definitions are not displayed; headcount findings are self-reported counterfactual estimates, not observed workforce outcomes.
Source independence
ssrn-only