From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract treats liability institutions as a workforce-capability instrument: firms preserve human fallback skill by keeping staff engaged with AI-handled cases, while legal constraints can close the signaling window and drive engagement and fallback capability toward collapse in the modeled market.
Scope: firm staffing, human–AI collaboration, deskilling, liability, and service-market signaling
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text, calibration evidence, and simulation code were not inspected.
- The page states that the work builds on two companion papers; this lane preserves the separate SSRN identity and does not infer version equivalence.
Source independence
ssrn-only