From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The paper models how regulatory, organizational, and task-level policy conflicts propagate across dependent agents and proposes cascade-aware resolution with selective human escalation. Across 15,000 synthetic trials, for which calendar time is not applicable, the abstract reports that a privacy-preserving cross-organizational reach declaration recovered 95.9% of the full-visibility oracle's escalation decisions.
Scope: enterprise multi-agent governance, organizational policy conflicts, dependency cascades, cross-boundary coordination, and human escalation
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; algorithms, proofs, synthetic-topology construction, and controlled workflow details were not inspected.
- The 95.9% denominator is the oracle's escalation decisions as stated on the abstract; the page does not provide the underlying decision count, and synthetic performance does not establish field effectiveness.
Source independence
ssrn-only