From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract models persistent personal AI state as an asset around which intermediaries can form rent-generating chokepoints, and contrasts machine-side custody with user-held cryptographic keys and genuine portability as alternative market structures.
Scope: platform power, switching costs, data custody, and AI-market structure
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and its historical argument were not inspected.
- The paper's graph model and secure-computation premise were not independently evaluated by this lane.
Source independence
ssrn-only