From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The paper proposes terminal-to-execution operative carryover to distinguish whether an element of an organizational AI position remains both lineage-supported and action-bearing downstream. In a predeclared model-blind test of 12 synthetic cases containing 15 focal elements, with no calendar period applicable, the abstract reports cross-vendor model agreement on 15 of 15 final classifications and 43 of 45 pooled sub-predicate and final codes.
Scope: organizational AI representation, human oversight, provenance, accountability, and execution lineage
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full test materials and adjudication details were not inspected.
- The abstract limits the result to synthetic model-blind reproducibility and does not establish human inter-rater reliability, construct validity, external validity, prevalence, or causal importance.
Source independence
ssrn-only