From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The conceptual paper proposes a code-capable engineer as an independent verification function within or directly accountable to an AI-governance structure, responsible for translating governance claims into executable tests, reproducing material system claims, documenting discrepancies, and escalating unresolved failures before authorization.
Scope: internal organizational AI governance, technical assurance, role design, evidence access, and escalation
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; the full role charter, propositions, and proposed experiment were not inspected.
- The page characterizes the work as conceptual and explicitly does not establish that one engineer can resolve legal, social, or ethical questions.
Source independence
ssrn-only