W3123282572 Management canon Management canon — not an AI paper

The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields

Paul J. DiMaggio · Walter W. Powell

Also recorded as: doi:10.2307/2095101

American Sociological Review

Source arguments
0
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
0
Recorded limitations
3
stated, never hidden

Management canon — not an AI paper

Why this work is here

This work belongs to the management canon because the B1 corpus evidence passed the ruled invocation test. The invocation statements below remain separate from the source’s own arguments; they are not claims about AI use.

Invocation endpoint ceiling: B1 establishes the source-level invocation records below but does not assert a public paper endpoint where its evidence bundle supplies none.

Corpus-evidenced invocation support

Within the adjudicated three-family local corpus, dimaggio-powell-1983 has 4 weighted invocation occurrence(s) (B1-L1=4; B1-L2=0; B1-L3=0).

local-corpus-extraction · confidence: high

Within the same corpus and the declared logical-document map, dimaggio-powell-1983 appears in 1 citing document(s) (B1-L1=1; B1-L2=0; B1-L3=0).

local-corpus-extraction · confidence: high

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded source arguments

Only separately evidenced source-argument claims appear here. B1 itself adds none; relevance to AI × MOS is carried only by the invocation relationship and is never retrofitted as an AI claim.

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • For dimaggio-powell-1983, 4 weighted invocation(s) in 1 logical citing document(s) come from related local B1 family/families B1-L1; they are not independent-literature or field-wide citation-frequency evidence.
  • These corpus-local invocation counts are source-argument evidence, not field-wide citation-frequency evidence.
  • Primary occurrences include ruled derivative observations; the FA-R7 count removes the identified duplicates.

Source independence

For dimaggio-powell-1983, 4 weighted invocation(s) in 1 logical citing document(s) come from related local B1 family/families B1-L1; they are not independent-literature or field-wide citation-frequency evidence.