From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Across four preregistered experiments and one supplemental study with 2,100 participants in total, the abstract reports lower perceived benevolence and trust for algorithmic than human managers in supportive work environments, while both manager types were similarly distrusted in abusive environments; the study period is not stated.
Scope: Five studies, total N=2,100; study-level and condition denominators are not reported on the abstract page
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract reports total N=2,100 but not study-level or condition denominators, effect sizes, coefficients, confidence intervals, p-values, participant population, geography, or observation period.
Source independence
ssrn-only