From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that professionals in accounting and law firms respond to AI adoption through intertwined forms of boundary work and that these responses reconfigure professional work, jurisdiction, and professional-service-firm organization.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20
The abstract reports that professionals in accounting and law firms use intertwined boundary work around AI, reconfiguring professional activity, jurisdiction, and organizational forms.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (5)
- Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
- The System of Professions
- When Knowledge Work and Analytical Technologies Collide: The Practices and Consequences of Black Boxing Algorithmic Technologies
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Cited by (9)
- When Do Individuals Believe in Themselves Rather Than in Artificial Intelligence? Insights from Longitudinal Investigations in Corporate Credit‐Rating Contexts
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- Industry Exposure to Artificial Intelligence, Board Network Heterogeneity, and Firm Idiosyncratic Risk
- The Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Organization and Work in an Era of Rapid Technological Change
- ‘Let Me Explain’: A Comparative Field Study on How Experts Enact Authority Over Clients When Facing AI Decisions
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
- Accommodating Machine Learning Algorithms in Professional Service Firms
- Beyond Anthropomorphism: Social Presence in Human–AI Collaboration Processes
- The Dark Side of Managing Human–AI Collaborations: Implications for Leaders’ Moral Relativism and Unethical Behaviour
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The public abstract does not state the study sample or period.
- Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only