From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A sustainable-business crowdsourcing challenge attracted 125 global solvers and produced 234 solutions; 300 evaluators each judged a randomized set of 13 solutions, creating 3,900 evaluator-solution pairs. Human-AI solutions matched human-only solutions on creativity and scored higher on value, while human-only solutions scored higher on innovation on average and among highly novel outcomes.
Scope: Universe and denominators: 125 solvers, 234 solutions, 300 evaluators, 13 assigned solutions per evaluator, and 3,900 evaluator-solution pairs; unit: solution/evaluator pair; period: not displayed.
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The abstract does not display condition-specific solution counts, rating scales, effect sizes, uncertainty, study period, or how prompt-engineering choices affect generalization.
- The retained author page displays a 2024-07-12 revision date while the retained abstract page displays 2024-03-29; the conflict is preserved.
Source independence
ssrn-only