W4391316582 Peer-reviewed research AI × management and organizations

#Knowyourworth: How influencers commercialise meaningful work

Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich · Sarah Glozer

Also recorded as: doi:10.1177/00187267231220260

Human Relations · 2024-01-29

Recorded claims
1
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
1
crossref-api-metadata
Recorded limitations
2
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The abstract reports that feedback from followers and social-media-platform algorithms participates in a reinforcing and sometimes undermining loop through which influencers assess the worth and meaning of their work.

confidence: high crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: abstract-level influencer-work study

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Cites (0)

No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Cited by (0)

No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Abstract-level evidence only; no full text inspected
  • Bound from an already-retained journal-query response containing multiple works; no post-audit refetch

Source independence

publisher-only