From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that expert engineers used stealth-work tactics to reclaim autonomy under centralized digital control.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (6)
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- The System of Professions
- Algorithmic Surveillance in the Gig Economy: The Organization of Work through Lefebvrian Conceived Space
- The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
Cited by (2)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only