W4400834182 Peer-reviewed research AI × management and organizations

Industry Exposure to Artificial Intelligence, Board Network Heterogeneity, and Firm Idiosyncratic Risk

Kerry Hudson · Robert E. Morgan

Also recorded as: doi:10.1111/joms.13127

Journal of Management Studies · 2024-07-19

Recorded claims
3
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
2
crossref-api-metadata, publisher-search-result
Recorded limitations
7
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The abstract examines how industry AI exposure and board-network heterogeneity jointly relate to firm idiosyncratic risk and states that cross-industry board-network positions can qualify otherwise favorable relationships.

confidence: moderate crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20

The abstract theorizes how industry AI exposure and heterogeneous board networks jointly shape market perceptions of firm-specific risk.

confidence: high crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: abstract-level

The publisher issue roster identifies an article linking industry AI exposure, board-network heterogeneity, and firm idiosyncratic risk.

confidence: moderate publisher-search-result apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: publisher issue-roster title and article-type metadata

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
  • The public abstract does not state the study universe, period, or denominator.
  • Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
  • Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
  • The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
  • The direct Wiley TOC returned HTTP 403; the retained public-search rendering supplied title, authors, date, pages, and article type.
  • No abstract or full text was inspected, so the claim is limited to title-level metadata.

Source independence

publisher-only