From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Evidence from U.S. audit-office adoption patterns and interviews with audit partners reports that AI use was associated with more auditor jobs, greater demand for soft skills, and more accurate audit opinions; investment was centralized while deployment decisions often remained local.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; audit-firm employment, skills, organizational authority, and audit quality; study period is not stated
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- The captured abstract does not state the empirical period or office denominator; numerical effect sizes are not carried forward.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
Source independence
publisher-only