From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that compensation design and AI framing affect managerial reliance on algorithmic advice and decision performance.
Scope: abstract-level
The publisher preview examines how compensation contracts and framing affect managerial decision makers' reliance on AI-based advice.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (5)
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- Algorithm-Augmented Work and Domain Experience: The Countervailing Forces of Ability and Aversion
- Aversion to Hiring Algorithms: Transparency, Gender Profiling, and Self-Confidence
- Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue heading.
Source independence
publisher-only