From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Based on 20 qualitative interviews with Serbian Wolt and Glovo couriers, the study links algorithmically structured earnings and scheduling to risky behaviors such as speeding, long hours, and skipped breaks, and proposes wage stabilization, algorithmic risk audits, and broader occupational-safety coverage.
Scope: Twenty qualitative interviews with food-delivery couriers in Serbia working through Wolt and Glovo; interview period, recruitment universe, platform-specific denominators, and prevalence estimates are not reported
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The abstract states N=20 but not the recruitment method, interview period, platform split, worker population denominator, or coding procedure.
- Qualitative interview evidence does not establish population prevalence or causal effects of dynamic pricing.
Source independence
ssrn-only