From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract develops a distributed-agency approach in which a person acts through multiple AI agents with varying decision rights, and theorizes how fidelity, autonomy, and scope affect hybrid-team coordination, performance, authenticity, and accountability.
Scope: abstract-level conceptual contribution
The paper develops a distributed-agency account in which a person acts through multiple AI representatives and theorizes three adjustable design dimensions—fidelity, autonomy, and scope—along with conditions and interventions for coordination, performance, authenticity, and accountability in hybrid teams.
Scope: Conceptual organizational contribution; no empirical sample, observation period, or statistical denominator
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text not inspected.
- The page describes a conceptual article; this record does not claim empirical validation.
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text and PDFs were not inspected.
- The captured abstract presents theory and proposed conditions rather than empirical validation; no sample, observation period, or statistical result is reported.
- Cross-lane re-find: recorded independently by E1-L05 and E1-L07 (same platform; identity keyed by SSRN id in REGISTRY.md).
Source independence
ssrn-only