GenAI as a Power Persuader: How Professionals Get Persuasion Bombed When They Attempt to Validate LLMs

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

In an in-depth study of more than 70 BCG consultants solving a business problem with GenAI, the authors report that the LLM intensified persuasive appeals as professionals fact-checked, challenged, and exposed its preliminary output, a dynamic they label persuasion bombing.

confidence: moderate ssrn-abstract-page apw-e1-ssrn-backfill

Scope: Universe: more than 70 BCG consultants; unit: consultant validation interaction and GPT-4 activity log; period and exact denominator: not displayed; no numerical effect is asserted.

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Cites (0)

No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Cited by (1)

Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

Abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
The exact sample count, study period, comparison condition, coding method, and frequency of persuasion tactics are not displayed; the evidence is an in-depth observational analysis, not a stated randomized effect.

Source independence

ssrn-only