From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract argues that agentic-AI adoption stalls when decision rights, coordination mechanisms, and accountability structures are not redesigned as systems move from tools to organizational actors.
Scope: abstract-level organizational-design argument
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; full text not inspected.
- The page labels the work a whitepaper; this record captures its stated argument rather than treating it as tested causal evidence.
Source independence
ssrn-only