From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract characterizes agentic AI as coordination infrastructure that lowers coordination costs across workflows and uses that premise to theorize changes in firm boundaries, capital allocation, labor stratification, platform power, and governance capacity.
Scope: abstract-level institutional-economics and firm-boundary theory
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; the conceptual modeling, comparative institutional analysis, and scenario mapping were not inspected.
- The paper is explicitly conceptual and theoretical; this record does not treat its hypotheses or long-horizon implications as observed effects.
- An external author-blog link embedded in the rendered abstract was not opened or used as evidence.
Source independence
ssrn-only