From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A game-theoretic model of a competitive workplace shows how AI-enabled transfer of high performers' knowledge can weaken their incentives; the modeled payoff from deployment depends on workforce heterogeneity, skill composition, skill disparity, compensation policy, and AI efficacy.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; workplace and firm-performance mechanism
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (4)
- AI, Skill, and Productivity: The Case of Taxi Drivers
- Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
- Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Improve Process Quality: Evidence from Semiconductor Manufacturing
- The Power of Disagreement: A Field Experiment to Investigate Human–Algorithm Collaboration in Loan Evaluations
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the publisher landing page could not be retained because public retrieval was access-blocked.
- Full text was not inspected.
Source independence
publisher-only