From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
In a two-period incomplete-contracts model, the abstract compares firm retention, employee portability, concurrent use, and no independent use of AI capabilities taught by employees. It reports that firm retention protects against employee departure but can weaken teaching investment, while concurrent use can outperform the alternatives by preserving firm access and improving employee incentives.
Scope: organizational learning, human capital, incomplete contracts, employee incentives, and AI capability ownership
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; the model assumptions, proofs, and parameter regions were not inspected.
- The contribution is theoretical; the inspected abstract reports no observed firms, workers, or calendar period.
Source independence
ssrn-only