W7202387325 Working papers AI × management and organizations

Three Ceilings: Model Monoculture, Solvency, and the Penalty Doctrine in Markets for Expert Services

Andreas Bauer

Also recorded as: doi:10.2139/ssrn.7252098 · ssrn:7252098

ssrn abstract page · 2026-08-13

Recorded claims
1
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
1
ssrn-abstract-page
Recorded limitations
2
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The abstract argues that common errors from model monoculture can make same-model verification unable to support liability-based competence signals, shifting the binding organizational and market constraints among verifiability, penalty doctrine, insurance, and firm solvency.

confidence: high ssrn-abstract-page apw-e1-ssrn-backfill

Scope: AI-enabled expert-service firms, verification, liability signaling, insurance, and solvency

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Cites (0)

No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Cited by (0)

No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Abstract-level evidence only; full text, external calibration inputs, and computational study were not inspected.
  • The page describes the work as theoretical and computational with no human-participant data.

Source independence

ssrn-only