From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A field experiment in a multinational pharmaceutical firm reports that tailoring AI interaction through work procedures, decision authority, training, and incentives to sales experts' cognitive styles improved sales performance, whereas untailored interaction produced role conflict and poorer outcomes.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; firm field experiment, work design, authority, training, incentives, and employee performance
The publisher issue listing places this paper in the special issue on the human-algorithm connection, and its preview abstract examines whether aligning human-AI interaction with workers' cognitive preferences improves performance on unstructured managerial tasks.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (9)
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- Algorithm-Augmented Work and Domain Experience: The Countervailing Forces of Ability and Aversion
- Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
- Competitive Advantage Through Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Theory of Situated AI
- Human and Machine: The Impact of Machine Input on Decision Making Under Cognitive Limitations
- Is Your Machine Better Than You? You May Never Know
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Are the Futures Computable? Knightian Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- The captured abstract does not state the field experiment's denominator or period.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue section heading.
Source independence
publisher-only