From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The publisher issue roster identifies an article applying an agency-theory lens to AI's evolution as an agent of the firm.
Scope: publisher issue-roster title and article-type metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (9)
- Are the Futures Computable? Knightian Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence
- Separation of Ownership and Control
- Artificial Intelligence, Trust, and Perceptions of Agency
- Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
- The Nature of the Firm
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Cited by (2)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- The direct Wiley TOC returned HTTP 403; the retained public-search rendering supplied title, authors, date, pages, and article type.
- No abstract or full text was inspected, so the claim is limited to title-level metadata.
- Crossref DOI corroboration is retained in crossref_jms_v63n2_page_gap_596_630.json (SHA256 212236175d4906bb5f7ad497787ca1b452f36226a98b80d85e02be19d3bfa638).
Source independence
corroborated:crossref-api-metadata