From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A field experiment with a large European savings bank reports that giving a human banker final authority over AI-generated investment advice did not reduce advice quality and increased customers' reliance relative to pure AI, with the consumption-side benefit attributed to the affective cue of human involvement.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; bank service production, decision authority, human-AI work design, and customer welfare
The publisher preview investigates whether keeping a human involved in AI-based financial-advice production benefits downstream consumers.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (2)
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- The captured abstract does not state the field experiment's denominator or period.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue heading.
Source independence
publisher-only