From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The publisher issue roster identifies an article on how a firm's AI specialization relates to the technology firms it acquires.
Scope: publisher issue-roster title and article-type metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (4)
- Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
- Algorithmic Routines and Dynamic Inertia: How Organizations Avoid Adapting to Changes in the Environment
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
- Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- The direct Wiley TOC returned HTTP 403; the retained public-search rendering supplied title, authors, date, pages, and article type.
- No abstract or full text was inspected, so the claim is limited to title-level metadata.
- Crossref DOI corroboration is retained in crossref_jms_v63n2_page_gap_596_667.json (SHA256 9ecb32657179fc82e8b266a51f66d5a303e202972e441b85a1059f3d11552436).
Source independence
corroborated:crossref-api-metadata