From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract explains how algorithmic credit-rating routines can reproduce organizational inertia through bounded model revision, sedimented inputs, simulation, and specialization.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (3)
Cited by (4)
- Examining the Effect of a Firm’s AI Specialization on the Technology Firms it Acquires: A Real Options Perspective
- The Axiology of AI Agents: How Human-AI Interaction Transforms Values from Espoused to Enacted
- Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human‐Algorithm Relations
- The Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Organization and Work in an Era of Rapid Technological Change
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only