From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract links leader–AI collaboration to team reflexivity, role-breadth efficacy, and team performance, with leader age shaping some relationships.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (8)
- A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice
- When Conscientious Employees Meet Intelligent Machines: An Integrative Approach Inspired by Complementarity Theory and Role Theory
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- Using Augmentation-Based AI Tool at Work: A Daily Investigation of Learning-Based Benefit and Challenge
- “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work
- The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence.
- The Role of Human Managers within Algorithmic Performance Management Systems: A Process Model of Employee Trust in Managers through Reflexivity
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only