Management canon — not an AI paper
Why this work is here
This work belongs to the management canon because the B1 corpus evidence passed the ruled invocation test. The invocation statements below remain separate from the source’s own arguments; they are not claims about AI use.
Invocation endpoint ceiling: B1 establishes the source-level invocation records below but does not assert a public paper endpoint where its evidence bundle supplies none.
Corpus-evidenced invocation support
Within the adjudicated three-family local corpus, nonaka-1994 has 3 weighted invocation occurrence(s) (B1-L1=0; B1-L2=3; B1-L3=0).
local-corpus-extraction · confidence: highWithin the same corpus and the declared logical-document map, nonaka-1994 appears in 1 citing document(s) (B1-L1=0; B1-L2=1; B1-L3=0).
local-corpus-extraction · confidence: highFrom the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded source arguments
Only separately evidenced source-argument claims appear here. B1 itself adds none; relevance to AI × MOS is carried only by the invocation relationship and is never retrofitted as an AI claim.
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (4)
- The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams
- Organizations as Artificial Intelligences: The Use of Artificial Intelligence Analogies in Organization Theory
- In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms
- Using Augmentation-Based AI Tool at Work: A Daily Investigation of Learning-Based Benefit and Challenge
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- For nonaka-1994, 3 weighted invocation(s) in 1 logical citing document(s) come from related local B1 family/families B1-L2; they are not independent-literature or field-wide citation-frequency evidence.
- These corpus-local invocation counts are source-argument evidence, not field-wide citation-frequency evidence.
- Primary occurrences include ruled derivative observations; the FA-R7 count removes the identified duplicates.
Source independence
For nonaka-1994, 3 weighted invocation(s) in 1 logical citing document(s) come from related local B1 family/families B1-L2; they are not independent-literature or field-wide citation-frequency evidence.