From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The Crossref-deposited abstract describes how intelligence officers translated opaque learning-algorithm predictions for police management and developed increasingly influential brokerage roles.
Scope: abstract-level evidence from an organizational ethnography of algorithm implementation
The publisher issue listing places this paper in the special issue on emerging technologies and organizing, and its preview abstract reports a 31-month ethnography of knowledge brokers translating opaque predictions during implementation of a learning algorithm by the Dutch police.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (5)
- Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments
- Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
- When Knowledge Work and Analytical Technologies Collide: The Practices and Consequences of Black Boxing Algorithmic Technologies
- A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Cited by (16)
- Fading Memories: The Role of Machine Learning in Organizational Knowledge Depreciation
- ‘Let Me Explain’: A Comparative Field Study on How Experts Enact Authority Over Clients When Facing AI Decisions
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
- Artificial Intelligence at Work: An Integrative Perspective on the Impact of AI on Workplace Inequality
- Taming Artificial Intelligence: A Theory of Control-Accountability Alignment among AI Developers and Users
- “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- Producing Images and Making Judgement: The ongoing use of epistemic technologies in expert work
- Would Archimedes Shout “Eureka” with Algorithms? The Hidden Hand of Algorithmic Design in Idea Generation, the Creation of Ideation Bubbles, and How Experts Can Burst Them
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- The Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Organization and Work in an Era of Rapid Technological Change
- When and How Artificial Intelligence Augments Employee Creativity
- Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human‐Algorithm Relations
- The Axiology of AI Agents: How Human-AI Interaction Transforms Values from Espoused to Enacted
- Interlacing Situated and Algorithmic Modes of Knowledge Work: A Workplace Jurisdiction Perspective
- Knowing Enough to Be Dangerous: The Problem of “Artificial Certainty” for Expert Authority When Using AI for Decision Making and Planning
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref abstract-level metadata only; the publisher surface returned HTTP 403; full text was not inspected
- Crossref supplied only year and month for the issue publication date
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue section heading.
Source independence
publisher-only