From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
A decision model combining explainable AI with quality-management theory was validated at a semiconductor manufacturer, where a field experiment and subsequent rollout reported improved production yield and revealed process-quality drivers missed by traditional methods.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata; manufacturing process management, improvement decisions, and operational performance; experiment denominator and period are not stated
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (3)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; the blocked publisher surface was not retried.
- The captured abstract does not state the experiment denominator or period; numerical yield effects are not carried forward.
- Crossref supplies only a year and month for publication, so published_date is null rather than an invented day.
- Full text was not inspected.
Source independence
publisher-only