From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The work examines work and after-work consequences of interacting with artificial intelligence.
Scope: title-level metadata; abstract not inspected
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (4)
- When AI Becomes My Teammate: Unpacking How Employees Perceive and Collaborate With Gendered AI Teammates
- Does AI at Work Increase Stress? Text Mining Social Media About Human–AI Team Processes and AI Control
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplied bibliographic metadata but no abstract.
- Scope and claim are limited to the title-level description.
- Crossref supplied only year and month, so published_date is null rather than an inferred day.
Source independence
publisher-only