From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The publisher issue roster identifies an article on organizational members' emotional and cognitive trust, AI performance, and adoption.
Scope: publisher issue-roster title and article-type metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (6)
- Algorithm-Augmented Work and Domain Experience: The Countervailing Forces of Ability and Aversion
- Competitive Advantage Through Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Theory of Situated AI
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Review of Empirical Research
- Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- The direct Wiley TOC returned HTTP 403; the retained public-search rendering supplied title, authors, date, pages, and article type.
- No abstract or full text was inspected, so the claim is limited to title-level metadata.
- Crossref DOI corroboration is retained in crossref_jms_ai_issue_bibliographic.json (SHA256 09f2707e67de2b15634dbce1ffaf62481bbe901ddaf6efdc4981f1abf86ba8c7).
Source independence
corroborated:crossref-api-metadata