W4408043896 Peer-reviewed research AI × management and organizations

Producing Images and Making Judgement: The ongoing use of epistemic technologies in expert work

Kajsa Lindberg · Daniel Tyskbo · Alexander Styhre

Also recorded as: doi:10.1177/01708406251326693

Organization Studies · 2025-05-11

Recorded claims
2
coded from the inspected source
Evidence classes
1
crossref-api-metadata
Recorded limitations
4
stated, never hidden

From the hash-bound evidence releases

Recorded claims

Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.

The abstract uses a longitudinal study of medical-imaging expert work to argue that opaque algorithmic technologies become epistemic through situated interactions and trained judgment during both production and use of their outputs.

confidence: high crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: abstract-level expert-work study

The abstract explains how experts make opaque algorithmic and AI technologies actionable through contextualized production and trained judgment.

confidence: high crossref-api-metadata apw-c1-obot-journals

Scope: abstract-level

Structured relationships

In-corpus citations

Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.

Boundaries

Limitations & independence

Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.

Recorded limitations

  • Abstract-level evidence only; no full text inspected
  • SAGE public DOI-page probes returned HTTP 403 during the lane, so claims rely on retained Crossref publisher-deposited metadata
  • Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
  • The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.

Source independence

publisher-only