From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that ride-hailing workers respond to algorithmic management through both engagement and deviance tactics, with both paths fostering consent while masking structurally problematic features of platform work.
Scope: abstract-level ride-hailing worker study
The abstract explains how algorithmic management segmented ride-hailing work and elicited worker consent through both compliance and system-manipulation tactics.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (7)
- Algorithms and their Affordances: How Crowdworkers Manage Algorithmic Scores in Online Labour Markets
- Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
- Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy
- Flexing and floundering in the on-demand economy: Narrative identity construction under algorithmic management
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations
Cited by (5)
- The Axiology of AI Agents: How Human-AI Interaction Transforms Values from Espoused to Enacted
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- Algorithmic management and worker agency: The platform perspective on algoactivism
- The Role of Human Managers within Algorithmic Performance Management Systems: A Process Model of Employee Trust in Managers through Reflexivity
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; no full text inspected
- Bound from the exact-work Crossref capture retained before the first-ten audit; no post-audit refetch
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only